Volume 35, Issue 6 , Pages 544-549, June 2010
Comparative efficacy of novobiocin and amoxicillin in experimental sepsis caused by β-lactam-susceptible and highly resistant pneumococci
Abstract
Therapeutic alternatives are needed against infections caused by highly multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Novobiocin, an old antibiotic, was tested in vitro and in a murine sepsis model against one amoxicillin-susceptible and three amoxicillin-resistant strains [minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) 8–64
mg/L]. Novobiocin MICs for all strains were 0.25–0.5
mg/L. In sepsis, novobiocin and amoxicillin were evaluated at 25, 50, 100 and 200
mg/kg given at 1, 5, 24 and 48
h post bacterial challenge. The most effective regimens in animals infected with the amoxicillin-susceptible strain were 200
mg/kg novobiocin and 25
mg/kg amoxicillin, achieving 100% survival and undetectable organisms in the peritoneum. Among mice infected with amoxicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae, 200
mg/kg novobiocin gave the highest protection (90–100% survivors), followed by 200
mg/kg amoxicillin (60–100%), 100
mg/kg novobiocin (50–87.5%) and 50
mg/kg amoxicillin (14.3–25%). The killing effect of antibiotics in the peritoneum (mean Δlog10 colony-forming units/mL between treated and control mice) was as follows: 200
mg/kg novobiocin (−6.6)
>
200
mg/kg amoxicillin (−5.6)
>
100
mg/kg novobiocin (−3.7)
>
50
mg/kg amoxicillin (−0.7). Total plasma and ultrafiltrate pharmacokinetics of novobiocin (200
mg/kg, single dose) in non-infected mice showed, respectively, half-lives of 151
min and 215
min, area under the concentration–time curves (AUCs) of 945.0
mg
h/L and 136.6
mg
h/L and maximal concentrations of 147
mg/L and 18
mg/L. Novobiocin may be a promising agent for therapy of highly β-lactam-resistant pneumococcal infections.
Keywords: Streptococcus pneumoniae, Antibiotic resistance, Sepsis, Novobiocin
To access this article, please choose from the options below
PII: S0924-8579(10)00081-6
doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.02.007
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
Volume 35, Issue 6 , Pages 544-549, June 2010
